<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steyr sheet metal rifle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/</link>
	<description>Adventures in gun building!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 01:33:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simonov Sunday &#124; WeaponsMan</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-86410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simonov Sunday &#124; WeaponsMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 17:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-86410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Here is a cool article on a prototype Steyr stamped replacement for the Kar98k http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here is a cool article on a prototype Steyr stamped replacement for the Kar98k <a href="http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/" rel="nofollow">http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.N.A.L</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S.N.A.L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-8121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what is the thickness of the receiver steel sheet? 2,2 mm ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the thickness of the receiver steel sheet? 2,2 mm ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrachya H.</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hrachya H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got it, thank you.

Another unusual thing is that channels (4 of them) in the rear portion of the receiver ... I wonder what they are for?

My best guess is they add structural strength to the stamping ... but maybe they guide the bolt or give room for dust and mud not to jam the action (considering that it is a military rifle)??? Any ideas?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it, thank you.</p>
<p>Another unusual thing is that channels (4 of them) in the rear portion of the receiver &#8230; I wonder what they are for?</p>
<p>My best guess is they add structural strength to the stamping &#8230; but maybe they guide the bolt or give room for dust and mud not to jam the action (considering that it is a military rifle)??? Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 04:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given time and tooling I think it would have cost less and been fasted. However with that said I think they would have been better of spending there money and time on an improved semi/full auto rifle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given time and tooling I think it would have cost less and been fasted. However with that said I think they would have been better of spending there money and time on an improved semi/full auto rifle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 04:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a front trunnion that is swagged in the sheet metal receiver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a front trunnion that is swagged in the sheet metal receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.N.A.L</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S.N.A.L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 22:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[low cost sheet metal gewehr.....  the mix of a k98 and a citroën 2cv :)


i think I can do most simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>low cost sheet metal gewehr&#8230;..  the mix of a k98 and a citroën 2cv <img src="http://gunlab.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>i think I can do most simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D.</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuck - Would this Steyr rifle be less expensive or faster to manufacture than the Kar.98k, given the manufacturing technology of the day? Looks to have a greater parts count and a number of tricky welding operations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck &#8211; Would this Steyr rifle be less expensive or faster to manufacture than the Kar.98k, given the manufacturing technology of the day? Looks to have a greater parts count and a number of tricky welding operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 14:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they had ever got all their ducks in a row they could have stamped those out much faster than milling all the K98k parts like they were doing in 42. I agree time and money would have been better spent manufacturing MP44s. But they learned a lot I am sure from this project that would have been later applied to the production of the MP44. Bill]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they had ever got all their ducks in a row they could have stamped those out much faster than milling all the K98k parts like they were doing in 42. I agree time and money would have been better spent manufacturing MP44s. But they learned a lot I am sure from this project that would have been later applied to the production of the MP44. Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your right Hrachya H, It is cool! The barrel to receiver transition caught my attention too...
Chuck, What did they use between the barrel steel and the stamped receiver?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your right Hrachya H, It is cool! The barrel to receiver transition caught my attention too&#8230;<br />
Chuck, What did they use between the barrel steel and the stamped receiver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrachya H.</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/steyr-sheet-metal-rifle/#comment-4255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hrachya H.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1467#comment-4255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool!!!

Are locking recesses machined into the barrel (or barrel extension) or there is a front trunnion there?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!!!</p>
<p>Are locking recesses machined into the barrel (or barrel extension) or there is a front trunnion there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
