Comments on: FN-FAL in 7.92×33 http://gunlab.net/fn-fal-in-7-92x33/ Adventures in gun building! Sat, 11 Apr 2026 23:49:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41 By: fn-49 person http://gunlab.net/fn-fal-in-7-92x33/#comment-11416 Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:28:58 +0000 http://gunlab.net/?p=3967#comment-11416 the original universal carbine looks like it uses a modified fn-49 receiver you should see if you could mate a fn fal lower receiver to a fn-49

]]> By: Rufus Chucklebutty http://gunlab.net/fn-fal-in-7-92x33/#comment-11375 Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:13:46 +0000 http://gunlab.net/?p=3967#comment-11375 Surely the receiver is heat treated and the weld will ruin that. The entire breach pressure is taken on the weld area ?

]]> By: GraveMrWhite http://gunlab.net/fn-fal-in-7-92x33/#comment-11346 Tue, 04 Aug 2015 03:31:25 +0000 http://gunlab.net/?p=3967#comment-11346 Mr. Chuck does fine work!

]]> By: Carl F. Fenzel http://gunlab.net/fn-fal-in-7-92x33/#comment-11339 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:31:57 +0000 http://gunlab.net/?p=3967#comment-11339 So, when you going to build it?

]]> By: john cross http://gunlab.net/fn-fal-in-7-92x33/#comment-11338 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:19:08 +0000 http://gunlab.net/?p=3967#comment-11338 1/ The FN in the photographs was not in the Kurz cartridge as we know it but the standard case with a longer and heavier projectile.

2/A better conversion is to cut 0.9″ out of the receiver and tig weld it together again with a modified magazine well to fit the standard MP44 MAG

]]>