<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AR-16 update and its smaller brother</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/</link>
	<description>Adventures in gun building!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 23:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-69455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel E. Watters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2019 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-69455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally found a dead tree publication reference to the AR-100 series.  The Elitool-owned ArmaLite claimed that they were going to produce it.  However, this was shortly before they were shuttered.

&quot;Arms and Defence in Southeast Asia&quot; (1989)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally found a dead tree publication reference to the AR-100 series.  The Elitool-owned ArmaLite claimed that they were going to produce it.  However, this was shortly before they were shuttered.</p>
<p>&#8220;Arms and Defence in Southeast Asia&#8221; (1989)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan E</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-8041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-8041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[an AR18 style bcg with a DI system seems like a neat idea.  I&#039;d imagine the bigger carrier would handle heat from sustained fire better than the AR one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an AR18 style bcg with a DI system seems like a neat idea.  I&#8217;d imagine the bigger carrier would handle heat from sustained fire better than the AR one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Watters</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel E. Watters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AR-16&#039;s forefather, the AR-12, was originally set up with a DI gas system.  There are photos showing the bolt carrier&#039;s face where the hole for the gas tube was welded shut.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AR-16&#8217;s forefather, the AR-12, was originally set up with a DI gas system.  There are photos showing the bolt carrier&#8217;s face where the hole for the gas tube was welded shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No plans that I&#039;ve been able to find]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No plans that I&#8217;ve been able to find</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They look a great deal like the AR-16 which was a 308 rifle however, these rifles are 5.56]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look a great deal like the AR-16 which was a 308 rifle however, these rifles are 5.56</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to see that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Harry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two separate sheets were photo shopped together and a small section of the photograph was missing. If I could find the rifles I would take new pictures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two separate sheets were photo shopped together and a small section of the photograph was missing. If I could find the rifles I would take new pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan E</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 09:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are there any plan drawings of any of these rifles?  Also I think I read somewhere about the AR16 prototyped as DI rifle, would love to know more about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any plan drawings of any of these rifles?  Also I think I read somewhere about the AR16 prototyped as DI rifle, would love to know more about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete F.</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/ar-16-update-and-its-smaller-brother/#comment-7817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete F.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=2078#comment-7817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an original AR100 brochure. Looking at the pictures of the versions of those guns there is little doubt that they are not drawings, but pictures of actual weapons.
Have to wonder where they are today. It&#039;s been suggested that they are .308 guns. I always took them to be 5.56. 
I also have a copy of the flyer where the 3 AR16&#039;s were being offered. Reed Knight having 2 Where is the third one?
 Pete]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an original AR100 brochure. Looking at the pictures of the versions of those guns there is little doubt that they are not drawings, but pictures of actual weapons.<br />
Have to wonder where they are today. It&#8217;s been suggested that they are .308 guns. I always took them to be 5.56.<br />
I also have a copy of the flyer where the 3 AR16&#8217;s were being offered. Reed Knight having 2 Where is the third one?<br />
 Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
