<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A british video of gun proofing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gunlab.net/a-british-video-of-gun-proofing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gunlab.net/a-british-video-of-gun-proofing/</link>
	<description>Adventures in gun building!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 23:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D.</title>
		<link>http://gunlab.net/a-british-video-of-gun-proofing/#comment-5810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gunlab.net/?p=1805#comment-5810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A splendid exercise in anachronism. Always wondered why European proof houses never adopted hydraulic testing for the raw barrel blank testing. Tank and cylinder testing has been hydraulic for over 100 years. More accurate and cheaper too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A splendid exercise in anachronism. Always wondered why European proof houses never adopted hydraulic testing for the raw barrel blank testing. Tank and cylinder testing has been hydraulic for over 100 years. More accurate and cheaper too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
